U.S. Expats in Canada - What Canadian banks will be reporting

This summary of how Canada has implemented its FATCA intergovernmental agreement with the U.S. on reporting on U.S. citizens may be of interest.  It was written by a Toronto based law firm, WeirFoulds LLP:

What is FATCA?

The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”) was enacted by the United States Congress in order to deal with non-compliance by US taxpayers using foreign bank accounts. FATCA requires foreign financial institutions to report to the IRS about financial accounts held by US taxpayers or by foreign entities in which US taxpayers hold a substantial ownership interest. Therefore, among those who are affected by this legislation include: dual Canada-US citizens, US residents and citizens who are residents or citizens of Canada, US green card holders, an estate of a decedent that is a citizen, residents of the US, and Canadians who have a joint bank account with a US person.

In February 2014, the Government of Canada and the Government of the United States entered into an intergovernmental agreement (“IGA”). The IGA allows Canadian financial institutions to report US taxpayers' information to the Canada Revenue Agency to be transmitted to the IRS (as opposed to directly reporting the information to the IRS). It also requires Canadian financial institutions to undertake certain due diligence procedures to identify US taxpayers' accounts.

FATCA is not limited in its scope to the financial services industry and many Canadian entities need to be concerned about its application. Under the IGA, an entity is a financial institution if it is: (i) a depository institution6; (ii) a custodial institution; (iii) an investment entity; or (iv) a specified insurance company.

Canadian financial institutions do not have to report on the following accounts:

    Registered Retirement Savings Plans;
    Registered Disability Savings Plans;
    Registered Pension Plans;
    Registered Retirement Income Funds;
    Pooled Registered Pension Plans;
    Registered Education Savings Plans;
    Deferred Profit-Sharing Plans;
    Tax-free savings accounts;
    AgriInvest Accounts; and
    Escrow Accounts.

In addition, pre-existing accounts that do not exceed a value of $50,000 are not required to be reported. Legislation to implement the IGA came into force on June 27, 2014. Financial institutions that are not governed by an intergovernmental agreement are required by FATCA to register with and report directly to the IRS. Failure to register and report to the IRS subjects the financial institution to a 30% withholding tax on payments received from a US source. Under the IGA, Canadian financial institutions avoid the 30% withholding tax if they register with the IRS and report to the CRA.

FATCA's Impact on Canadian Financial Institutions

(1) Requirements of FATCA for Canadian Financial Institutions

On July 1, 2014, Canadian financial institutions were required to undertake the due diligence procedures agreed to in the IGA, which identifies US taxpayers' accounts. The CRA introduced Guidance on enhanced financial accounts information reporting for financial institutions to assist with, among other things, the due diligence procedures and reporting obligations. Canadian financial institutions are required to collect and report the following information:

    the name and identifying number of the reporting Canadian financial institution;
    the name, address, and US taxpayer identification number of each account holder who is a US person (as defined in the IGA);
    the account number; and
    the account balance or value as of the end of the reporting period (or the date an account was closed).

(2) Requirements of Canadian Financial Institutions Going Forward

By May 2nd of each year beginning in 2015, Canadian financial institutions are required to file electronically with the CRA an information return in relation to each US taxpayer's account. Also in 2015, Canadian financial institutions will need to collect and report the following information in addition to the information above:

    where the account is a custodial account, the total gross amount of interest, dividends, and other income generated with respect to the assets held in the account, that was paid or credited to the account during the reporting period;
    where the account is a depository account, the total gross amount of interest paid or credited to the account during the reporting period; and
    where the account is not a custodial or a depository account, the total gross amount paid or credited to the account holder with respect to the account during the reporting period.

In 2016 and subsequent years, in addition to the information required to be reported in 2015, for custodial accounts it will be necessary to report the total gross proceeds from the sale or redemption of property paid or credited to the account during the reporting period where the Canadian financial institution acted as a custodian, broker, nominee, or otherwise as agent for the US person who is the account holder.

Each reporting Canadian financial institution will be treated as compliant with FATCA, receive a Global Intermediary Identification Number (“GIIN”) and therefore be exempt from the 30% withholding tax on payments received from a US source if in addition to fulfilling the collecting and reporting obligations identified above they:

    report annually to the CRA the name of each Nonparticipating Financial Institution (as defined in the IGA) to which payments have been made and the aggregate amount of such payments;
    register on the IRS FATCA website;
    withhold 30% of any US Source Withholdable Payment (as defined in the IGA) to any Nonparticipating Financial Institution; and
    provide to any immediate payor of such US Source Withholdable Payment the information required for withholding and reporting to occur with respect to such payment.

Therefore, in order to ensure compliance, Canadian financial institutions should, among other things:

    identify their classification under FATCA to determine whether registration is required and which collection and reporting obligations they are required to perform;
    register with the IRS;
    establish procedures for all new accounts to determine the US status of new clients and implementing a due-diligence process on their pre-existing accounts to determine which of their current clients are US persons; and
    establish reporting procedures to the CRA for the information collected about their US account holders.

In order to facilitate compliance, on or about January 12, 2015, the IRS launched a secure web application for host country tax authorities (such as the CRA) to transmit and exchange FATCA data.

FATCA's Impact on US Persons Who Hold Financial Accounts in Canada

The IGA is a tax information sharing agreement only; it does not change the US tax obligations of US persons. The CRA will not assist in the collection of penalties associated with the failure of a US person to report their assets held at non-US financial institutions. Moreover, the CRA will not collect tax liabilities of a Canadian citizen if the individual was a Canadian citizen at the time the particular liability arose (even if he was also a US citizen at the time). However, armed with the knowledge the CRA provides, the IRS is better equipped to know who to pursue for tax evasion.

Canadian financial institutions now have to verify whether an account holder is a US person. As a result, individuals may be asked to certify or clarify to their financial institutions their US tax status and/or produce documents such as a driver's license for any representation they make.

A Canadian financial institution that maintains an account identified as belonging to a US person has to report that person's US federal taxpayer identification number (which is usually their US social security number) when reporting information to the CRA. US persons are required to provide their US federal taxpayer identification number to their financial institution when asked for it. Failure to provide their identification number may cause the CRA to exchange information about their account with the IRS prior to confirming their US tax status.

Before FATCA, the IRS was likely unaware of certain transactions that occurred outside the US which should have attracted US tax consequences. The IGA assists the IRS in determining who has failed to pay US taxes on these type of transactions. To avoid unintended consequences, if you have financial accounts in Canada and have not already reported all of your worldwide financial assets to the IRS, you should:

    determine your US tax status (are you a US person under the IGA?); and
    if you are a US person, consult a US tax lawyer.

Since 2009, the IRS has collected US$6.5 billion in unpaid tax and penalties and approximately 45,000 Americans have disclosed offshore holdings.

The Canadian Initiative

FATCA appears to have influenced the Canadian government to implement its own initiative aimed at identifying tax evasion and aggressive tax avoidance. Effective January 1, 2015, the CRA's electronic funds transfer rules came into force requiring certain financial intermediaries to report incoming and outgoing transfers of CAD$10,000 or more to the CRA. The rules require that a qualifying electronic funds transfer be reported within five business days of the transaction. For this purpose, multiple transactions occurring within a 24-hour period conducted by, or on behalf of, a single entity will be aggregated to determine if the transfer is CAD$10,000 or more. This new requirement applies to financial intermediaries defined in the Income Tax Act as “reporting entities” including: banks, credit unions, caisses populaires, trust and loan companies, money service businesses and casinos. If Canada's response to FATCA is any indication of the tone in Canada, the era of transparency, enhanced regulation and strong sanctions for offshore financial management is here to stay.

Thorough information, SAWMAN. 

However, readers should be made aware that this information comes straight from a compliance-industry (accountancy/tax-filing) company which makes it's money with more and more US tax filing rules (so has a very vested interest in seeing everyone comply with these US rules based on severe economic sanctions for failure to comply with this police state's demand). 

Further, this information was sent to this "US Expats In Canada" page from a person who IS NOT EVEN AN EXPAT (so has no real understanding of the effect of FATCA on REAL US EXPATS living in Canada or elsewhere).  Maybe Sawman works with/for this compliance industry????

To gain a better understanding of the US Expat's perspective on this issue, take a look at the 3 years (and ongoing) pages of the IssacBrockSociety.ca as well as http://www.adcs-adsc.ca/ (the Alliance for the Defence of Canadian Sovereignty).  A whole different picture arises.  You too can support a Canadian Constitutional challenge against this IGA,which demolishes the sovereign Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and other Canadian laws which stem from this legal basis. 

Canada is NOT a 51st state of the USA for them to push us (their closest ally and trading partner) around.

LLGM wrote:

Maybe Sawman works with/for this compliance industry????


[Moderated : Show respect to members! ]


The article explains laws CANADA has passed, NOT U.S. LAW.  Sorry for trying to post something useful for the normal, non-tin-foil-hat crowd.

Sawman,

[Moderated item ]
Well, what do you, from your comfortable chair as a non-US-expat, know about the draconian effects of FATCA on US persons living abroad?  Perhaps you have swallowed the "homelander myth" that all US persons living outside the US borders are disloyal fat-cats or tax-cheating criminals who are just trying to hide money from the IRS, that we are probably need (punatively) the over-arching unpaid oversight which FATCA requires of all non-US financial institutions (that everyone everywhere should become an unpaid arm of the IRS to round up all those US persons who are no longer inside the US borders (and maybe shouldn't be trusted). 

While not (yet_ happening in Canada, do you have any knowledge how many of your fellow (expat) citizens now have had their entire banking/credit options reduced to zero in the country where they are living (maybe for most of their lives) because of FATCA's effect?  Do you think Canada (or any other country) signed on to the FATCA IGA because they loved and trusted and agreed with the USA?   That they passed this law because they saw the need from their own perspective?   Or is it because of the US LAW - - and the shot-gun threatened 30% economic sanctions made intimidatingly clear if they didn't "go along"?  Who the H**L is the US to dictate such terms to even "friendly" nations, along with the very hollow US promise of "reciprocity (which is never going to happen)? 

You and others need to learn more about what your fellow citizens (who DO iive abroad) are saying and experiencing and feeling about this, rather than blythly promoting (from your comfortable chair within the US as a non-expat) the high-bully totally intrusive and anti-sovereignty rules/regs that the IRS is imposing (without Senate approval) on Canada (and every other nation in the world).  Even if one is 100% compliant with their US taxes (a task that has required as many as 200 pages of "routine annual filing" in the last few years and a 4-digit annual payment to the accountant to understand all these very complicated and ever-expanding forms and policies), the gathering of all (and I mean ALL) one's personal information (and that of one's totally non-US spouse or business partner or disabled child with whom one has a joint account) over the border of a sovereign nation which has had long-established privacy and equality of rights rules, is nothing to accept lying down.

If you were born in Ohio and moved to Texas as a child and continued living their into adulthood, how would you feel about Ohio coming into Texas and telliing you that you have been remiss all these years in filing Ohio taxes and now they were going to lay multiple $10,000 penalties on you, and possible jail time, for "non-compliance"?????  Or for not filing forms that no one told you about/you had no idea existed ??????? 
It is totally ironic that the 13 colonies fought a revolutionary war over this exact same issue, but I guess the US has forgotten that part of their history....

[Moderated : No slangs on the forum please ]
I made no commentary about the merits or wisdom of any law, I simply passed along information useful to those seeking to understand what was happening.  You can stand on your soap box all day long and cry out against Yankee-ism.  I don't care.  I might even agree.  Again, the information presented are facts, not rantings from some  mad man destined to live angry for his or her remaining mortal life. Get a job or a hobby!

I am no loonier than you, Sawman.  You who may be able to "share" the "information rules" as have been imposed on Canada by the US, but (it appears, and particularly given that you are NOT an Expat and DO NOT live in Canada) appear to know nothing about the continuing (expat as well as full-blooded Canadian Person) within-Canada political and legal actions against FATCA and these US-dictated laws. 

You may not say anything about the merits or wisdom of any law, but you (as a US person living inside the US)  providing only US-slanted information to US Expats in Canada, take a position which is not 100% in keeping with the US-Expat-in-Canada experience.  The Expat experience, I might remind you, is the basis for this ExpatBlog!!!

Yes, FATCA in all it's many "wonderful" ways is the current law in Canada, but just like the US Republicans are about to legally challenge this US-unconstitutional law within the US courts, there is active movement/legal action against this legislation within Canada. 

US Expats living in (or coming to) Canada need to know THESE FACTS too, not just that there are the "US-imposed laws" that the Canadian government caved into. 

You can sit in your comfortable "unaffected non-Expat" chair all day long and berate/belittle the efforts of US citizens who actually live abroad , I don't care.  You are not a mad man, but nor am I.  The USA was built by pioneers and activists; Canadian US-Expats who are fighting FATCA are just continuing that honorable tradition.

You, and others, should go forth and read and actually learn something regarding the very legitimate, law-and-fact-based position of those US Expats who actually are living abroad before you further demean/defame/infantalize the democratic efforts of these US Expats working legitimately (within the law) to regain their legal and internationally-acknowledged civil rights.   

All who want to know the reality of US Expats in Canada should check out IsaacBrockSociety.ca.  BTW,  for you who are not a US-Expat in Canada, Isaac Brock was one of the famous Canadians who, in 1812, kept the US out of Canada.  All we want is to maintain "US law out of Canada", to allow Canada to fully maintain it's right to create and maintain CANADIAN law without infringement from a FOREIGN country.

Hello

Could we please calm down here? Each and everybody has the right to have their own opinion, but Respect should always prevail!

This thread will be closely monitored, if you continue to send spikes to each other like this, the whole thread will be removed from the forum.

You can desagree, but with professionalism and no cheap words please.

Regards
Kenjee
Expat.com Team

Good morning, Kenjee,
Thank you for your comments.  And I agree.

All we want is to maintain "US law out of Canada"
Too late......

Not necessarily too late according to a number of highly regarded constitutional, tax and citizenship legal experts.

See the Alliance for the Defence of Canadian Sovereignty ( http://www.adcs-adsc.ca/ ) and, if you do not think the US should be able to dictate to the whole world, consider supporting your fellow US expats living in Canada. 

Even a quick look at the extensive (3-year running) Isaacbrocksociety.ca site will also broaden your world view away from totally US-centric.